- From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:47:40 -0800
- To: Jan Roland Eriksson <jrexon@newsguy.com>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
On 3/25/04 12:36 PM, "Jan Roland Eriksson" <jrexon@newsguy.com> wrote: > On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:35:53 -0800, you wrote: > >> Either browsers handle valid content correctly or not, that has nothing to >> do with DOCTYPE switching. > > You use the word "valid" in a way that leads me to beleive you are into > SGML thinking here. I meant "valid" only in terms of being valid against whatever specifications the content is based upon. You're right that the term "valid" is overloaded and may imply other aspects which I didn't mean to. Better would have been "conformant", as in, content which conforms with the appropriate specifications. Thanks, Tantek
Received on Thursday, 25 March 2004 15:47:44 UTC