- From: Felipe Gasper <fgasper@freeshell.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 23:24:04 -0600
- To: Sam Kearns <sam@hinterlands.com.au>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
My mistake - I didn't realize that CSS3 touched on things like that. It seemed to me from your question that you meant to debate the legitimacy of such HTML markup: <a href='foo.html' target='myNewWindow'>Click me</a> ...hence my suggestion to turn to an HTML list. Mea culpa. -FG Quoth Sam Kearns on 3/2/2004 7:41 PM... > > Umm.. OK. > > I read the CSS3 Hyperlinks draft and at the top it said this was the > list for discussion regarding the contents of the draft. Bascially what > I am debating here is wether target-new and target-position should be in > the draft or not. > > You mention I should perhaps post in a UA specific list but the topic I > raised is not UA specific, in fact if anything it's trying to remove UA > specific things (such as the ability to support and control multiple > windows) from the draft. > > Having said that I can understand if this list is only for discussing > the semantics of the things that are in the draft, not change the > fundamental nature of the functionality they support. As I said before I > am completely new to W3C discussions so I don't really know my way > around the huge number of mailing lists and their scopes. > > Can someone suggest a better place to bring this up? > > Cheers, > Sam > > > Felipe Gasper wrote: > >> >> I could be wrong, but I would say that this list probably isn't the >> best place to discuss something like that. What a browser does with an >> anchor tag is probably best discussed on an HTML-specific list >> (www-html@w3.org, is it?) or a UA-specific list like the various >> Mozilla discussion groups. >> >> -Felipe Gasper >> Urbana, IL >> >> Quoth Sam Kearns on 3/2/2004 7:14 PM... >> >>> >>> Hi Everyone, >>> >>> I am completely new here so if your thinking maybe I "don't get it" >>> on some issue or another you may very well be correct and I gladly >>> welcome any corrections or clarifications you would like to add. This >>> email is just offered to promote some debate, I don't think I am the >>> first or last word on this issue. Also, to make things simpler, >>> whenever I say "window" in the text below I mean any window, tab or >>> rendering surface. >>> >>> I believe that the decision of wether to open a new window when a >>> link is clicked is entirely up to the user and/or their user agent. I >>> don't think the page author has any business at all making this >>> decision. >>> >>> It is my opinion that the target attribute of a link should never be >>> able to affect any window/tab other than the one in which it was >>> clicked. The only thing I would like to see the target attribute used >>> for is to control existing frames or iFrames within the same window. >>> >>> I have never seen a page that either affected or opened another >>> window that wasn't guilty of at least one of the following. >>> a) Could be done better using DIVs or iLayers (like progress >>> meters, psuedo dialogue boxes, help info, etc.) >>> b) Made a decision that should rightfully only be made by the user >>> (opening a link to another site in a new window) >>> c) Tried to subvert and/or control the users browsing experience >>> to the detriment of the user. (pop-ups, pop-unders etc.) >>> >>> To that end I would like to see the concept of opening new windows >>> through the target property removed from future CSS specifications. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Sam >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2004 00:24:09 UTC