Re: CSS2.1 WD: Mistakes in conformance example

On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Brant Gurganus wrote:
>
> Actually, I though the HEAD element was required, but its enclosing tags
> were optional.

My bad. That is correct.

-- 
Ian Hickson                                      )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
U+1047E                                         /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
http://index.hixie.ch/                         `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2004 11:43:09 UTC