- From: James Bigelow <jhb@jhb.boi.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 19:32:23 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-style@w3.org, ernestcline@mindspring.com
Thank you for your comment on the CSS3 Paged Media Module, archived in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Dec/0130.html Your issue, shown below, has been assigned the number 21. > > Having opened Pandora's box with "A4" and "letter", I feel that the > standard should either (1) explain why the decision was made to limit > the listed sizes to just these two, (2) drop these sizes, or (3) > change the list of predefined sizes and explain why those were chosen. > > With "A4" and "letter" as part of the standard, it does not take much > imagination to suppose that there will be those who try to extend the > standard on their own. It would be best if the standard tries to > control these non-standard extensions is some manner. > > For example, one could justify supporting only the ISO defined paper > sizes (ISO 216). envelope sizes (ISO 269), etc. by way of > non-hyphenated keywords. Then if national sizes need to be predefined > as well, the standard could specify a convention such as: > <country-code> "-" <name> Thus, we could have "us-letter" "ca-p4" or > "ja-b4" if including keywords for national standard paper sizes be > deemed necessary. > A further response will be forthcoming. Please address any replys to www-style@w3.org with [css3-page] in the subject line. -- Jim Bigelow, Editor
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2004 04:36:27 UTC