- From: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:22:30 -0500
- To: "BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1)" <jim.bigelow@hp.com>, www-style@w3.org
> [Original Message] > From: BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1) <jim.bigelow@hp.com> > To: <www-style@w3.org>; <ernestcline@mindspring.com> > Date: 1/7/2004 8:32:42 PM > Subject: RE: [css3-page] LCWD issue 29 -- [29] Section 8 > > Ernest, > > I agree that <angle> in the range of 0 to 260 is preferable to <integer>. I > look to profiles such as the CSS Print Profile for low cost printers to > simplify the range to 0, 90, 270. Starting at the full range and allowing > capable printers to implement to their ability seems like a good idea to me. Just to be clear, I was referring to the <angle> value type from CSS3 Values [1] not some new definition of <angle> that would allow only degrees. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-css3-values-20010713/#angles
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2004 23:22:26 UTC