- From: BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1) <jim.bigelow@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:24:37 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org, ernestcline@mindspring.com
Ernest, > > Why does the page context have no notion of fonts? Couldn't this be > the same as the notion held by ":root" exterior to this @-rule? Or The page context comes before and is independent of content. You don't want to specify the width of the page in points. It's a physical sheet of paper, better suited to be described in absolute terms. Perhaps, Hokum or another CSS WG person can offer a more compelling or coherent explanation. Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: James Bigelow [mailto:jhb@jhb.boi.hp.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:44 PM > To: www-style@w3.org; ernestcline@mindspring.com > Subject: [css3-page] LCWD issue 22 -- [22] Section 3.3.2 <length> > > > Thank you for your comment on the CSS3 Paged Media Module, > archived in: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Dec/0130.html Your issue, shown below, has been assigned the number 22. > > Why does the page context have no notion of fonts? Couldn't this be > the same as the notion held by ":root" exterior to this @-rule? Or > does this introduce some sort of loop that isn't apparent to me? > Granted, specifying page margins with respect to font size may not be > a good thing to do most of the time, but I fail to see why it is > impossible. > A further response will be forthcoming. Please address any replys to www-style@w3.org with [css3-page] in the subject line. -- Jim Bigelow, Editor
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2004 20:24:43 UTC