[css3-reader] compared to aural

• From: Phil Baines <phil@gnasp.com>
• Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:02:50 -0500 (EST)
• To: www-style@w3.org
• Message-ID: <403E5EFA.1030402@gnasp.com>

Hi,

What would the difference be to having a 'reader' media type, to the 
currently existing 'aural' media type? Surly screen readers should be 
encouraged to use the 'aural' media type. especially considering that 
all the reader related styles are in fact called 'aural styles' are they 
not??

Apologies if I am completely off the mark with this one. I am rather new 
to CSS in the grand scale of things.

Regards,
Phil Baines

Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 18:29:16 UTC