- From: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:25:43 -0500
- To: "Jens Meiert" <jens.meiert@erde3.com>, "W3C CSS" <www-style@w3.org>
> [Original Message]
> From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
>
> If not already suggested: What about to allow at least 'capitalize' in
> combination with 'lowercase'? I think that's a combination which would
> make sense, since one might want to force a specific notation e.g. in
> headlines:
>
> h1 { text-transform: lowercase capitalize; }
>
> The 'text-transform' [1] value could simply be changed to
>
> uppercase | [lowercase || capitalize] | none | inherit
>
> ...although I'm not sure if this turns into a serious compatibility issue.
I don't think that it would be a serious comparability problem,
but I fail to see the utility of it as proposed.
I presume you want it so as to be able to turn a plain text:
"THIS IS A HEADLINE THAT WAS TYPED IN ALL CAPS"
into: "This Is A Headline That Was Typed In All Caps".
but Ideally, when such a plain text was placed into markup,
with the headline placed into an element, it would also be turned
into lowercase as appropriate. If it isn't placed in a separate
element, then applying such a transform would make some letters
that weren't capitalized, capitals, thus turning:
"THIS IS A HEADLINE THAT WAS TYPED IN ALL CAPS
And this is the text that follows it." into:
"This Is A Headline That Was Typed In All Caps
And This Is The Text That Follows It."
Now what might be worth adding would be another keyword:
'decapitalize' that would turn all but the first letter of a word into
lowercase. Thus turning:
"THIS IS A HEADLINE THAT WAS TYPED IN ALL CAPS
And this is the text that follows it." into:
"This Is A Headline That Was Typed In All Caps
And this is the text that follows it."
Such a new keyword would be just as compatible as your
proposal to allow "text-transform: lowercase capitalize;"
while being a bit more useful in that it would turn leave words
that are in lowercase alone.
I'm not certain of how useful it would be, but I think such
an approach would be better than the one you proposed.
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 14:25:41 UTC