- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:54:17 +0000 (UTC)
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Cc: fantasai@escape.com
fantasai wrote: > s/clearance/float clearance/ Changing it just in one place would be more confusing, we think (using two terms for one concept), and changing it in multiple places would make the text a lot harder to read, we think (and this text is already quite verbose enough as it is). Since the first occurance of clearance links straight to the definition, we really don't see that it is much of a problem. -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL U+1047E /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2004 18:54:19 UTC