- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:25:59 +0100
- To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
* Tantek Çelik wrote: >>>> I assume you mean by considering it closed that the Working Group will >>>> report my objection to the Director in their request for advancement. >>> >>> By considering it closed we mean that the points raised in your previous >>> emails in this thread have been responded to. >> >> Ok. >> >>> Please quote and cite with URL predating the CSS 2.1 LC deadline what you >>> consider your objection to be, because otherwise, the group believes all >>> your objections have been responded to and properly explained. >> >> I am just pointing out that your response does not remove my objection. > >I am just pointing out that by failing to provide a quote and cite with URL >predating the CSS 2.1 LC deadline with what you consider your objection to >be, you have removed your objection. I may register formal objection at *any time* and I obviously cannot register formal objection prior to the review deadline if I object to a response of the Working Group that is sent past this deadline, hence I do not understand how the Last Call Review Deadline is relevant here. I neither understand why I need to point you at my formal objection, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2004Feb/0102.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2004Feb/0107.html I sent it to the list in response to what I object to, that should be absolutely sufficient. Since I cited technical arguments and proposed changes to remove my objection, the chair is required to report my objection to the Director as general rule of advancement. Please cite the relevant sections in the Process Document if you disagree.
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 17:25:59 UTC