- From: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:42:59 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
Bert Bos wrote: > This is the CSS WG's response to an issue you raised on the last CSS > 2.1 draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-CSS21-20030915). We want to > publish CSS 2.1 as a CR in about two weeks. Please let us know this > week if you think our response is wrong. > > Your e-mail: > http://www.w3.org/mid/3F94ED06.5060006@escape.com > > # Stacking contexts are not necessarily related to containing blocks. > # In future levels of CSS, other properties may introduce stacking > # contexts, for example 'opacity'. > > The second sentence should not have [an example]. > > CSS WG response: > No change. We disagree. The reason I say you should not have an example is because referring to a CSS3 property in a CSS2 specification creates unnecessary dependencies between the two and should thus generally be avoided. If you need to specify somewhere that CSS3's 'opacity' creates a stacking context, specify it in CSS3's 'opacity' description, not here. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 13 February 2004 14:44:52 UTC