- From: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:29:38 -0500
- To: "W3C CSS List" <www-style@w3.org>
> [Original Message] > From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org> > To: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com> > > This is the CSS WG's response to an issue you raised on the last CSS > 2.1 draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-CSS21-20030915). > > Your e-mail: > > Is the computed value of "1cm" and "10mm" the same or different? > Because you need to convert in order to make them the same, and > converting units involves computation... > > CSS WG response: > We appreciate your input but we don't really want to change this > at this time. Actually, I would have to say that in the context of CSS, it would be best to not require that 1cm = 10mm exactly. Here's why: The UA may wish to use a non metric value for its internal use. Now if 1cm is converted to x units and 1 mm is converted to y units, it need not be the case that x=10y when both conversions are done to the best ability of the device. Even if x=10y, given the effect of round-off error, it might well be the case that 1.3 cm would not be the same as 13mm for the same reasons that 1.3 * 10 might not equal 13 on a binary computer. As for whether CSS 2.1 should mention this, probably not, but the WG should think about including a note about this in CSS3 Values and Units.
Received on Friday, 13 February 2004 00:29:32 UTC