- From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:31:29 +0100
- To: Tex Texin <tex@i18nguy.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
This is the CSS WG's response to an issue you raised on the last CSS
2.1 draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-CSS21-20030915). We want to
publish CSS 2.1 as a CR in about two weeks. Please let us know this
week if you think our response is wrong.
Your e-mail:
http://www.w3.org/mid/3F8E6343.710045EE@i18nguy.com
# ...consider the value of 'text-transform' to be 'none' for
# characters that are not from the Latin-1 repertoire and for elements
# in languages for which the transformation is different from that
# specified by the case-conversion tables of ISO 10646 ([ISO10646]).
b) From an international perspective, I don't see why you mention
latin-1 at all. Why should latin-2 users for example not have the
benefit of text-transform? Why not simply require support for the
10646 case conversion table, since Unicode character support is
more generally required elsewhere? Given everything else needed to
implement CSS, the Unicode case conversion table seem to be a very
small burden to implementers.
CSS WG response:
See 126.
For the CSS WG,
Bert
--
Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
http://www.w3.org/people/bos/ W3C/ERCIM
bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
+33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2004 16:33:57 UTC