- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:28:53 -0600
- To: "BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1)" <jim.bigelow@hp.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1) wrote: > Okay, so the page name in the @page is an identifier and auto is an > identifier. I still think it the description of the @page rule should remain > as it is now and not as Ernest suggested: > >>Value: <identifier> >>Initial: auto So if in the future you introduce a meaningful (in that it has special semantics) identifier other than "auto" here, pages that use that as a page name break? Is there a reason not to just use strings for page names and auto be an identifier? That is: page: auto | <string> That would be much more future-proof. -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2004 20:29:13 UTC