- From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 23:04:17 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
This is the CSS WG's response to an issue you raised on the last CSS
2.1 draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-CSS21-20030915). We want to
publish CSS 2.1 as a CR in about two weeks. Please let us know this
week if you think our response is wrong.
Your e-mail:
http://www.w3.org/mid/3F81EB3F.5020400@escape.com
S4.3.6 <http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-CSS21-20030915/syndata.html#color-units>:
# The format of an RGB value in the functional notation is 'rgb('
# followed by a comma-separated list of three numerical values (either
# three integer values or three percentage values) followed by ')'.
Is rgb(255, 0, 50%) invalid, then?
CSS WG response:
Yes. (Was already like that in CSS1.)
For the CSS WG,
Bert
--
Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
http://www.w3.org/people/bos/ W3C/ERCIM
bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
+33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2004 17:05:17 UTC