- From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:46:40 +0100
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
This is the CSS WG's response to an issue you raised on the last CSS
2.1 draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-CSS21-20030915). We want to
publish CSS 2.1 as a CR in about two weeks. Please let us know this
week if you think our response is wrong.
Your e-mail:
http://www.w3.org/mid/200309282052.h8SKqWwA020953@nerd-xing.mit.edu
Section 5.11.3 (The dynamic pseudo-classes: :hover, :active, and
:focus)
<http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/WD-CSS21-20030915-diff/selector.html#dynamic-pseudo-classes>
If an element is hovered, are its ancestors considered hovered?
CSS WG response:
Leaving this undefined for CSS21. Added that whether :hover and
:active apply to ancestors is undefined. Added note at end of
5.11.3 about :active in CSS1 only applying to links.
For the CSS WG,
Bert
--
Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
http://www.w3.org/people/bos/ W3C/ERCIM
bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
+33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Monday, 9 February 2004 11:56:26 UTC