- From: Justin Wood (Callek) <116057@bacon.qcc.mass.edu>
- Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:01:17 -0500
- To: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- CC: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>, www-style@w3.org
Of course Dave, but as I read it proposed outline-width _must_ be specified for offset to be included, and offset _must_ always follow outline-width to be acheived. ~Justin Wood (Callek) David Hyatt wrote: > > You can't disambiguate width and offset, since they can both (for > example) be pixel values. In general the values of a shorthand need > to be distinguishable, so that it's always clear which property each > value in the shorthand represents. > > dave > (hyatt@apple.com) > > On Dec 27, 2004, at 12:10 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > >> >> Currently 'outline' shorthand property defined [1] as >> [ <'outline-color'> || <'outline-style'> || <'outline-width'> ] | >> inherit >> >> This definition does not include 'outline-offset'. >> >> I propose to define it as: >> >> [ <'outline-color'> || <'outline-style'> || <'outline-width'> [ >> <'outline-offset'> ]? ] | inherit >> >> Thanks, >> >> Andrew Fedoniouk >> http://terrainformatica.com >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-css3-ui-20040511/#outline >> >> >> >> >>
Received on Monday, 27 December 2004 21:02:13 UTC