- From: Anne van Kesteren (fora) <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 20:05:08 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, www-style@w3.org
>>>You want all the background-* properties to be linked? >> >>Yes, I think so. I think I misunderstanded you. I didn't want them to be linked that way, but I understand they kind of "must" be linked that way since the shorthand 'background' property is really multiple properties from a browser/DOM kind of view? > So what does: > > background-image: url(404), url(404); > background-color: blue; > > ...do? Since my intention was that this is different from: background:blue url(404),url(404); I would say the that 'background-image' results to its initial value (I don't look up the specs right know, but I expect that happens when the resource can't be found). And 'background-color' results into 'blue', the only option given, which is probably supported. If 'background-color' would read: background-color:blue,lime; It would still have been 'blue', since the browser supports that and doesn't have to fall back. > What about: > > background-image: url(white), url(black); > background-color: white, black; > color: black, white; > > ...? Should 'color' be linked to background-* as well? background-image:url(white); /* assuming that isn't a 404 image */ background-color:white; color:black; -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 14:05:25 UTC