Re: content: url() is bad wrote:
> (and when testing Mozilla the behavior differs when 
> supplied a size in which case it also seems to be kept as replaced). 

So you're testing CSS support in quirks mode?  Pretty bad idea in 
general....  I recommend testing with some sort of relatively modern 
doctype that will trigger standards mode in the relevant browsers.


Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2004 17:10:27 UTC