- From: Anne van Kesteren (fora) <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:24:57 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, www-style@w3.org
>> color:change-red-amount(255),red; > > You can already do this. > > color: red; > color: change-red-amount(255); > > Forward compatibility was part of CSS1's original design. Let me give you one of the examples Tantek provided using CSS1 syntax (I hope): background: lime; background: red url(fancy-lime-pattern-returns-404); This will be read as (or similar, probably using a hex value): background: red; Using (assuming the whole "serie" must "pass" in CSS3): background: red url(fancy-lime-pattern-returns-404), lime); Would solve this problem and it can be made backwards compatible as well, since a comma is not part of the 'background' property in CSS 2.1. (For properties that have a comma as part of the value, there has to be found a way to ensure backwards compatible parsing, of course; I think that is possible.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2004 02:25:16 UTC