- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 19:52:20 -0500
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: > So the image in an <img> is not the element's contents? No. It's what the element _is_. The contents of an element are something the element is a box around.... bug again, maybe that's just me. > Ah. I'm finding it difficult to understand why whether the content causes > height/width 'auto' to mean 'intrinsic' rather than 'fill' changes whether > it is content or not... There are other differences between replaced and non-replaced elements (for example, the handling of before/after may need to be different; see previous discussions we've had on that). So it's not just width/height handling. -Boris
Received on Monday, 12 April 2004 20:52:50 UTC