- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 00:16:49 -0600
- To: "Sean M. Hall" <pianoman@reno.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Sean M. Hall wrote:
> CSS3 Compatibility Tables:
> http://www.geocities.com/seanmhall2003/css3/compat.html
If I may offer some advice:
1) From each row, link to the tests you used to come to your
conclusions for that row. That helps people verify the table. It
also lets them see what exactly the green means.
2) Please don't list things about browsers you couldn't have tested.
Mozilla 1.7, in particular, does not exist (though Mozilla 1.7b does
in fact support the ~ combinator).
3) The statement in the list styles section is simply false. UAs have
support for some of the algorithmic, numeric, and alphabetic styles
that were added in CSS3 (though said support is not always
completely correct... but none of your tests really test
correctness).
4) On the point of correctness, what does "yes" actually mean in these
tests? Just that the UA can parse the property and render it
properly in the simplest case? Or that it handles it properly across
a wide range of use cases? The latter is what would be really
useful.
This could be quite an excellent undertaking with significantly expanded
tests and fewer absolute claims....
-Boris
Received on Saturday, 3 April 2004 01:16:55 UTC