- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 08:52:03 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > I think the Candiate Recommendation Exit Criteria listed in the > CSS 2.1 Last Call Working Draft "violate" the W3C Process Document. > > It states that features may get dropped under certain circumstances but > it does not identify which features are considered at risk. The Process > Document requires to identify such features, otherwise the document > would be put back to the Working Group for further work if features are > dropped. This probably not intended by the statement. Going back to Last Call with an updated document is actually what I would prefer. Any feature we remove is likely to cause big changes to the document and we really should have a solid revew period for that. -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL U+1047E /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 22 September 2003 04:52:08 UTC