- From: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:25:44 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
> From: Charles Kendrick <charles@isomorphic.com> > > That's a good point - but that's what "!important" rules in user stylesheets are for. > > It is already possible for a designer to create problems for people with motor difficulties, poor > visual resolution, partial or total colorblindness, etc. I think the way to avoid this to educate > designers about accessibility problems. Arbitrary limits on what can and cannot be styled won't > really help given that accessibility problems can be created anywhere by a designer who isn't aware > of accessibility concerns. > > Also, if I can't style the scrollbars, I can't offer novice users a high contrast / poor motor > skills skin for my site or web application. I'm not saying that just to say it, by the way. Our > product does offer skinnability, and we have had requests for a high-contrast skin. At the moment > we can accomodate that via our DHTML scrollbars, but not via plain CSS. I'd have to agree with Charles here. User agents that don't allow one to have user stylesheets or to turn off the default stylesheet, or use alternative stylesheets cause problems beyond this one area. With them, allowing CSS to suggest a presentation for scrollbars is no more subject to potential abuse than other style capabilities such as the following CSS which reverses a common convention for visited and unvisited links . :link {color:purple} :visited {color:blue} There are plenty of non-web programs (mostly games I admit) that use non-standard, fancified UI widgets. If a user can't stand them, then they won't use the program. The same goes for webpages. Since CSS doesn't control anything outside the viewport, I see no new problem in having CSS being able to suggest the style of scrollbars.
Received on Friday, 12 September 2003 18:25:37 UTC