- From: Dris <dris86@cox.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:36:07 -0600
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Nov 18, 2003, at 10:58 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: >> Also, I wasn't assuming they all look like Windows scrollbars (note >> my reference to different user agents and widget differences). I'm >> using Mac OS X, and that's what I was modeling it after. > > The OS X scrollbars are very difficult to imitate if the browser > assumes that the scrollbars are Windows-like. In particular, the > extreme positions of the slider are hard. Mozilla tried to mimic the > OS X scrollbars using boxed images, but it didn't work out. > Thankfully, native scrollbars are used now. Actually, looking at theme files for Mac OS X and the like, scrollbars are made up of around six (maybe a few more, such as for the transparent effect on the grip tab) images for each direction (vertical and horizontal). > Also, suppressing system scrollbars causes all sorts of annoying > issues with mouse wheels and assistive technologies. I would hope that UA's would use the system's input API to make the scrollbars just as functional. > >> A few other suggestions: >> y-scrollbar-arrow-orientation: top || bottom || both; >> y-scrollbar-tab-proportion: proportional || fixed; > > I prefer to keep those settings to my system-wide preferences without > every Web author altering them. And thus, you have the beauty of overriding CSS with a custom file. Of course, a designer could set these to "default" to automatically pass the user's system preference. ________ "Irony is a voluntary survey with required fields." ~ Dris ~
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2003 18:36:09 UTC