- From: David Latapie <julian27@ifrance.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 08:48:34 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Sunday 9 November 2003, at 10:43AM, Jungshik Shin wrote: > Because Tex already has given an elaborate argument against using > frequency and popularity as a guideline for standard-writing, 1. Could you send me a link? 2. I guess the reason for this "strange" 2.1 recommendation is more "political" than technical. The purpose may be to allow browsers to be considered as CSS-compliant in order to be usable with governments. A way to save time in order for the browsers companies to be compliant with the future, "real" CSS (i.e. CSS3). -- David
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 09:09:47 UTC