Re: css21 list-style-type dropped types

On Sunday 9 November 2003, at 10:43AM, Jungshik Shin wrote:

>  Because Tex already has given an elaborate argument against using
> frequency and popularity as a guideline for standard-writing,

1. Could you send me a link?

2. I guess the reason for this "strange" 2.1 recommendation is more 
"political" than technical. The purpose may be to allow browsers to be 
considered as CSS-compliant in order to be usable with governments. A 
way to save time in order for the browsers companies to be compliant 
with the future, "real" CSS (i.e. CSS3).


Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 09:09:47 UTC