CSS2.1 WD: Mistakes in conformance example

I noticed two mistakes in the CSS2.1 Working Draft example in 'Conformance:
Requirements and Recommendations' [1]: One the one hand, the <head /> element
is missing in the example's document source, but (correctly) listed in the
document tree below. One the other hand, shouldn't the used Doctype comply
with one of the valid DTD's you should normally use [2], e.g. with an HTML 4.01
Doctype?


All the best,
 Jens.


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/conform.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.html


-- 
Jens Meiert
Interface Architect

http://meiert.com

Received on Thursday, 6 November 2003 03:59:42 UTC