This section contains the comment: (So basically any number of '::outside', '::before', '::after', and '::alternate' pseudo-elements, so long as no two '::outside' pseudo- elements are adjacent, as that is meaningless.) However the working draft goes on to mention ::outside(n) (as well as ::before(n) and ::after(n) Might not the intended phrase have been: , so long as no two '::alternate' pseudo-elements are adjacent, ^^^^^^^^^ since there is no ::alternate(n)?Received on Monday, 26 May 2003 13:18:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:07 UTC