- From: Yung-Fong Tang <ftang@netscape.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 16:04:11 -0800
- To: John Lewis <lewi0371@mrs.umn.edu>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Received on Monday, 17 March 2003 19:06:18 UTC
oic I thought the origional request just want to used to implement the "Top Ten" in the "Late Show with David Letterman" such as http://www.cbs.com/latenight/lateshow/top_ten/archive/ls_topten_archive2003/ls_topten_archive_20030225.shtml I guess I misunderstand the request. John Lewis wrote: >Yung-Fong wrote on Monday, March 17, 2003 at 4:46:23 PM: > > > >>Is that true this could be achieve by counter-increment: with -1 in >>CSS2 already? >> >> > >Partly, if I understand the original message correctly. > >"The integer indicates by how much the counter is incremented for >every occurrence of the element. The default increment is 1. Zero and >negative integers are allowed." > >However, this will only change the numbering of the list. It will not >actually reorder the list. (CSS stays away from that sort of thing.) >In effect, something like this: > > 1. Item one > 2. Item two > 3. Item three > >Could become this: > > 3. Item one > 2. Item two > 1. Item three > >But the desired effect is this: > > 3. Item three > 2. Item two > 1. Item one > > >
Received on Monday, 17 March 2003 19:06:18 UTC