- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 01:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Mikko Rantalainen <mira@st.jyu.fi>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Mikko Rantalainen wrote:
>
> OK, it's the more general problem then. How about:
>
> span { position: relative; top: 0; }
> span:hover { top: 100%; }
>
> In that case, hovering the mouse moves the element and causes the
> element be no longer be hovered -- and the element moves back to it's
> original position and it is again hovered, right?
Yes, but in that particular case there is a simple solution, which is to
say that :hover is only changed during a mouse-move event (this is what
UAs do, in fact).
> Would it be somehow possible to modify rendered content without removing
> the :broken status? Perhaps adding some invisible content that would be
> regarded as :broken?
I don't really understand how such complexity is really that useful.
--
Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL
"meow" /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2003 04:44:38 UTC