- From: (wrong string) äper <christoph.paeper@tu-clausthal.de>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 06:15:30 -0400 (EDT)
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
- Cc: "Charles Kendrick" <charles@isomorphic.com>
Charles Kendrick <charles@isomorphic.com>: > > HTML, CSS and DOM can be appropriate tools for *both* document > construction and web application creation. You'll need a scripting language along with DOM. I don't know what you understand as "web applications", probably basically the use of the HTML elements for forms in combination with a serverside or, in lesser useful cases, a clientside scripting language. > The fact that the same language and tools and the same skillset > work for both purposes is a huge benefit - not a problem. I've yet to see a web application developer to mark up a document correctly, though. > If the W3C working groups continue to define the web browser > as strictly a document viewer, The W3C doesn't define web browsers. It merely specifies how its standards should be interpreted. > and to deflect all requests for functionality that does not > fit into the strict notion of a media-independent document, Why doesn't my watch include a mobile phone and an MP3 player? Because its job is to tell me time and date, nothing more. It does its job perfectly as do the other two things I carry around. Do you know XForms, XQuery etc.? > it is very likely that a proprietary technology will > ultimately be used for web applications, For many cases that would be the right choice indeed. P.S.: Full quoting at bottom is the opposite of useful.
Received on Monday, 7 July 2003 05:18:23 UTC