- From: Simon Jessey <simon@jessey.net>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 17:17:43 -0500
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
I like this suggestion. I prefer the specialized forms :char() and :word(), and perhaps they could be expressed like :char('a'), :char('©'), :char(odd), char(even), :word('foo') etc. Simon Jessey w: http://jessey.net/blog/ e: simon@jessey.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christoph Päper" <christoph.paeper@tu-clausthal.de> To: <www-style@w3.org> Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 3:34 PM Subject: Pseudo Element for Strings > > Hi! > > I've been thinking about this and came to the conclusion that I don't really > favor it, but anyhow want to know what others think: > > It happens occasionally that you want to style certain letters and strings, > but without adding semantics, e.g. color all vowels red, highlight search > results or fancy style a reappearing company name. This can't be done with > CSS alone, yet. > > I hereby suggest (not propose) a pseudo element which selects all strings > (or single characters) that match its argument: '::string(arg)'. > > As far as I understand it, this probably would seriously decrease rendering > speed, in a much greater amount than e.g. ::first-line does already. That is > why support for it should be optional for conformant UAs IMHO. > /Maybe/ you could speed this up with more specialized ::word() and > ::letter() or ::char(). > > Christoph Päper >
Received on Sunday, 26 January 2003 17:17:40 UTC