- From: Jim Dabell <jim-www-style@jimdabell.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 14:22:04 +0000
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 10:09 am, Shelby Moore wrote:
> >Ian Hickson wrote:
> > code { binding: url(code.xml#brief); }
> > code:hover { binding: url(code.xml#details); }
>
> I was waiting to see if any one else would point out that Ian proposed a
> logical endless loop condition.
Is this any different to:
<script type="text/javascript">
while(1);
</script>
...or:
foo.html:
<object data="foo.html">
> When you dynamically replace the implementation (binding), then the
> bounding box can change, then the :hover state can oscillate. You could
> send the UA into an endless loop. Even if you tried to move the mouse to
> break out, the UA might be too busy processing the endless loop
> condition.
You mean like:
a:hover { display: none; }
a { display: block; }
Seems to me that these things already exist, and user-agents are just
expected to cope.
--
Jim
Received on Tuesday, 7 January 2003 09:22:37 UTC