Re: XBL is (mostly) W3C redundant, and CSS is wrong W3C layer for semantic behavior *markup*

At 01:30 AM 1/6/2003 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> I feel my previous points already refute his summary and can stand
>> on their own.
>
>As far as I am aware, you haven't replied to any of the points I listed in
>my last post [1], ever.


Yes I am starting to ignore you "argument by filibuster" approach to
debate.  Your supporters even say you have a history of excessive posts[2].

Let's get down to central themes.

I've already provided a definition by which to judge what is "presentation"
and not[1]

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Jan/0114.html

[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Jan/0120.html
"you _only_ sent 345 between december 2000 and now so please give your
trophy back"

-Shelby Moore

Received on Sunday, 5 January 2003 20:48:09 UTC