Re: XBL is (mostly) W3C redundant, and CSS is wrong W3C layer for semantic behavior *markup

At 10:12 AM 1/5/2003 -0800, David Hyatt wrote:

>Events in an XBL binding are attached to the bound element just as the 
>other sections of the binding are.   I'm not sure what you mean by 
>>> Note that XBL itself is largely agnostic regarding how it is bound.
>> Cool!  But the <handler> is bound non-orthogonally.
>I don't understand this.  See above.  Why are event handlers any 
>different from the other parts of the binding?

Inability to separate...

I will just go straight to the final answer since it supercedes your other

See the following 2 posts for final answer:



-Shelby Moore

Received on Sunday, 5 January 2003 13:21:41 UTC