Re: XBL is (mostly) W3C redundant, and CSS is wrong W3C layer for semantic behavior *markup from David Hyatt on 2003-01-05 (www-style@w3.org from January 2003)

From: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 23:08:42 -0800
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-Id: <859C1937-207C-11D7-8F9D-00039382AC6C@apple.com>

BTW, TGSR?  Delphi?  I'm so sure.  :)

dave

On Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 10:58 PM, David Hyatt wrote:

>
> On Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 10:00 PM, Sandy Moss wrote:
>
>> 3. This is all tangential to the real issue at hand
>> anyway, and that is: does XBL even change tag
>> semantics?  Perhaps superficially, but a graphical
>> comparison of the language to others (CSS, Delphi,
>> etc.) reveals an axiomatic TSGR[1] of no more than
>> 20-30%.  This would seem to indicate, unless anyone
>> has a more normative source, that semantic
>> metamorphosis in XBL is negligible at best.
>>

Received on Sunday, 5 January 2003 02:09:37 UTC