Re: XBL is (mostly) W3C redundant, and CSS is wrong W3C layer for semantic behavior *markup

BTW, TGSR?  Delphi?  I'm so sure.  :)


On Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 10:58 PM, David Hyatt wrote:

> On Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 10:00 PM, Sandy Moss wrote:
>> 3. This is all tangential to the real issue at hand
>> anyway, and that is: does XBL even change tag
>> semantics?  Perhaps superficially, but a graphical
>> comparison of the language to others (CSS, Delphi,
>> etc.) reveals an axiomatic TSGR[1] of no more than
>> 20-30%.  This would seem to indicate, unless anyone
>> has a more normative source, that semantic
>> metamorphosis in XBL is negligible at best.

Received on Sunday, 5 January 2003 02:09:37 UTC