Re: XBL is (mostly) W3C redundant, and CSS is wrong W3C layer for semantic behavior *markup*

On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Shelby Moore wrote:
> 
> I remember you wrote in this thread that citing normative references
> is very important.  Where is your normative reference which states
> that specification _completely_ controls semantics??

I have already replied to this twice, once in my last e-mail:

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Jan/0074.html

...and once in the e-mail before that:

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Jan/0074.html

...and you _still_ haven't replied to the numerous arguments I made in
the e-mail before _that_:

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Jan/0054.html

...that were unrelated to semantics but covered the various other
technical issues you brought up.

You are now ignoring my arguments and simply replying as if I haven't
replied to yours, even avoiding quoting my questions. Please don't let
this thread become a farce.

-- 
Ian Hickson                                      )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
"meow"                                          /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
http://index.hixie.ch/                         `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:59:48 UTC