- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 01:01:21 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Shelby Moore wrote: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Jan/0000.html > > The missing link in your diagram is that XBL should have a bi-drectional > line to "MathML, XHTML" ("Semantics"). Per your <A> date example, XBL has > power to modify the meaning of semantic layer (and cause the content markup > in between <a> and </a> to be ignored). Study the example more carefully, and you'll find that actually what it does is execute some script when the page is loaded. That script performs a regular expression match on the element's contents, and if they match a specific pattern (i.e. if they are a date) then it does some mathematical operations and then invokes a couple of DOM methods to change the in-memory DOM tree. It does not even remotely touch the underlying representation. Now, please explain to me how this is in any way more of a corruption of the semantics than the following: <xsl:template match="a"> <a>new content</a> </xsl:template> -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL "meow" /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 1 January 2003 20:01:23 UTC