- From: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:49:26 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Chris Lilley wrote to <www-styl@w3.org> on 2003-02-27 09:36 in "Re: CSS1 is obsolete" (<mid:71233171.20030227183632@w3.org>): > IH> Is HTML 3.2 "deprecated, [obsolete], or historical"? > > No, but it should be and I would like to see [it] demoted from a > Recommendation. A quick read of the W3C Process document reveals that this cannot be done as such [REC]: In this version of the Process Document, there are no maturity level changes after Recommendation; a technical report remains a Recommendation indefinitely. > IH> Maybe the > IH> W3C should follow the IETF lead in marking old specifications as > IH> HISTORICAL or OBSOLETED, but that is not up to the CSSWG as far as > IH> I know. > > Actually it is, in the same sense that making things be Recs is the > responsibility of the WG - to inform the director and present > evidence. The Process document is not as clear about this as it could be. I gather that the only way to deprecate or retire a Recommendation is to issue another Recommendation to that effect [REC]: The status section of any Recommendation must indicate its relationship to previous related Recommendations (e.g., an indication that a Recommendation supersedes, obsoletes, or subsumes another, etc.). The Working Group could use CSS3 modules to retire levels 1 and 2 or could issue dedicated retirement Reccomendations. The process for producing such retirement Recommendations is as for any other Recommendation [TR], so I believe and support Chris when he writes that the deprecation is the responsibility of the Working Group. [REC] World Wide Web Consortium. "Recommendation (REC)" (section 5.2.5) in "World Wide Web Consortium Process Document". 19 July 2001. <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process-20010719/tr.html#RecsW3C> [TR] World Wide Web Consortium. "Technical Reports" (section 5) in "World Wide Web Consortium Process Document". 19 July 2001. <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process-20010719/tr.html#Reports>
Received on Friday, 28 February 2003 03:50:00 UTC