- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 03:54:52 -0600
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
David Woolley wrote: > In my view, although a W3C standard, SVG owes > its lineage much more to PDF than to HTML. Well, it _is_ supposed to be a vector graphics language... which puts it squarely in the postscript/pdf crowd of functionality. So that's not surprising (and not even necessarily undesirable; you can still provide ALT text for SVG images)
Received on Friday, 21 February 2003 05:00:38 UTC