- From: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 01:44:59 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hello, These are minor editorial comments for your Media Queries Candidate Recommendation [1]. Could you move the Requirements and Related work sections to an appendix? They're relevant but they are a little bit like a research paper and they lead the reader in only to say that what was just presented isn't what you are trying to specify. In the Abstract, s/are two of media types/are two media types/ s/Status of this document/Status of This Document/ s/a web browser/a Web browser/ s/UA/user agent (UA)/ (in its first occurrence) In the TOC and in headings (that aren't media features), words can be capitalized in US English, for example, s/Table of contents/Table of Contents/ s/reserved in. HTML4/reserved in HTML4./ s/Appendix (CC/PP attribute vocabulary for print and display) describe/Appendix (CC/PP attribute vocabulary for print and display) describes/ s/width of a the text display device/width of the text display device/ s/CamelCase/camelCase/ (normally this is a quibble but here you are pointing out that 'charWidth' starts with lowercase) s/Like CC/PP, RFC2534 also provides/Like CC/PP, RFC 2534 provides/ s/knowing which one of the defined media types which most closely resembles the device./knowing which one of the defined media types most closely resembles the device./ s/px unit/"px" unit/ s/tty devices/"tty" devices/ s/tv/"tv"/ In 5, "see CSS2, section 4.3: Values and Units" needs a link to References for people who print this out. s/("(min-color: 1)/("(min-color: 1)")/ For width and height: "viewport (as described by CSS2)" could have reference something like: "viewport as described by CSS2 ([CSS2] section 9.1.1)." "page box (as described by CSS2)" could be: "page box as described by CSS2 ([CSS2] section 13.2)." "RFC2531 [RFC2531]" needs a link and could be a normative reference. s/greater than 300 dots per inch/greater than or equal to 300 dots per inch/ s/pixels. in/pixels in/ The title of normative references should point to dated specs. Also, references should have no live URI links. Here is the guideline: http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#References Also it's unclear in [CSS2] and in [HTML401] why "Ian Jacobs" differs from "Jacobs, I.." In Appendix B, s/W3C working draft. (Work in progress.)/W3C Working Draft (work in progress)./ For RFCs, s/Internet RFC/The Internet Society. RFC nnnn/ Comment on the style sheets: - in the embedded style, where background is declared, you would also declare color (in case someone wants to use a reversed value user style sheet). - in default.css, is it possible you could justify only for print? The text looks a little choppy. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/CR-css3-mediaqueries-20020708/ Best wishes for your project, -- Susan Lesch http://www.w3.org/People/Lesch/ mailto:lesch@w3.org tel:+1.858.483.4819 World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/
Received on Saturday, 8 February 2003 04:45:25 UTC