- From: Sigurd Lerstad <sigler@bredband.no>
- Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 18:19:27 +0100
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
Okay, that sounds better :) I should have read the thread more carefully. > > Are you refering to the opacity property in CSS3? > > Yes. > > > Is it being removed? > > Don't believe so. ;) > > If you look at the definition of "opacity" in the current draft, it is: > > Value: <alphavalue> <priority-index>? | inherit > > Where <priority-index> is defined as: > > An optional positive integer value or the keyword 'none'. The <priority-index> > value indicates the priority for this element to make use of any hardware > acceleration for its opacity effect. A priority of 'none' means the hardware > opacity acceleration may be ignored for this element. Positive integer values > are treated similarly to HTML's tabindex. Any hardware opacity acceleration > capabilities are allocated in order of the elements with the lowest > priority-index. > > It is this prose (which attempts to coerce user-agents into particular uses of > hardware capabilities) that I was referring to in my original mail. Ian's > response was that priority-index is being removed, which is great news from my > point of view. > > No one is making the <alphavalue> part of the property go away, I would hope. ;)
Received on Saturday, 1 February 2003 11:22:04 UTC