- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@iinet.net.au>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 13:46:09 +1100
- To: www-style@w3.org
David Woolley wrote: >>The other difference would be that text that exceeds the width to the >>next tab stop and causes the next field to skip to the one after, would > > > That would seem to me to be an argument againt tab stop based layout. > > Tab stops are really a technical solution to the problem of doing > layout on a mechanical typewriter. > > As all ready noted, the browser developers rejected them in favour > of tables, by sidelining HTML 3.0 and producing what had to be reverse > engineered into HTML 3.2. I thought of a place where using tables, or other markup may be inappropriate to use as a substitute for tabs. When marking up a section of code, within <code> or <blockcode> for XHTML, it is common for many authors to use tabs for indentation. Many editors also reduce the spacing for tabs to 4 spaces, instead of the default 8 spaces. It would be nice if CSS had a way to at least be able to set the default tab width for such cases. CYA ...Lachy!
Received on Sunday, 21 December 2003 21:49:45 UTC