- From: Afternoon <afternoon@uk2.net>
- Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 06:09:00 +0000
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 9 Dec 2003, at 5:52, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > The one my initial message mentioned was site security domains -- any > set of pages within a single security domain is considered a single > "site". Sorry, yes, I've read that post properly now. > There are other things the UA could do. Site groups (like IE and > Mozilla already have for security zones), "same site" matches like the > "same site" functionality Mozilla uses for its "only load images from > the same site" preference, etc. I think these UA groupings would probably do for many cases, but I can't help thinking about that one page that has a black background when the rest of the site is white. E.g. http://film.guardian.co.uk/ vs http://www.guardian.co.uk/ and everything else. But I'd also like to restate the point here that I think the key thing that would make this technology worth considering is widespread implementation, so if it would be (much) simpler to implement this way, then that's potentially a better solution. > There are probably other things that could be done there; I don't > really care much about the topic, so I've not put much thought into > it. ;) Hmmm, <frowns/> (q) Ben Godfrey? (a) Web Developer and Designer See http://aftnn.org/ for details
Received on Tuesday, 9 December 2003 01:10:17 UTC