- From: François Yergeau <francois@yergeau.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 21:16:53 -0500 (EST)
- To: ernestcline@mindspring.com
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
Ernest Cline a écrit : > Making stuff that was acceptable earlier > unacceptable should only be done when there is a compelling > reason to do so. Other than a theological debate over whether it is > a character, I see no reason to do so, and that reason is not compelling > to me. Nor to me. But a much stronger reason for wanting U+FEFF excluded from identifiers is that it is now deprecated in Unicode, because of the ambiguity of its role as a BOM or a ZWNBSP. Unicode has introduced U+2060 to play the latter role and recommends to use it exclusively. That's about as much a Good Idea as equating the BOM and ZWNBSP was a Bad Idea, and it would be nice if CSS could take heed. Regards, -- François
Received on Monday, 8 December 2003 05:15:31 UTC