- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 16:40:58 +0200
- To: Alexander Savenkov <w3@hotbox.ru>
- CC: (wrong string) åkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
On Sunday, April 13, 2003, 6:08:52 PM, Alexander wrote: AS> Hello again, AS> 2003-04-11T12:18:46Z Michael Day <mikeday@yeslogic.com> wrote: >>> I have some sympathy for the proposal, and I think the "A4" value was >>> part of the proposal for the "size" property at some point. It was >>> removed based on feedback from a major printer manufacturer who said >>> there are lots of different systems and conventions for naming paper >>> sizes worldwide. >> This means that we should avoid named paper sizes that have differing >> interpretations in different parts of the world. However, A4 and the other >> ISO paper sizes are international standards used throughout the world and >> should not suffer from this problem. Does the value "A4" really have other >> meanings in some locations? AS> I just hope we don't get another US-centric feature here. Since A4 is used pretty much everywhere in the world *apart* from the US, in some ways its the opposite of a US-centric feature. AS> Isn't it possible to introduce ISO values without touching ANSI, AS> JIS, etc.? Huh? AS> I'm fed up with 'pt' values that are ruining the traditional European AS> typography nowadays. People are looking forward for a fix (a new unit AS> or a clarification about US/European points). THAT would be nice. A pt is defined to be 25.4/72 mm in CSS. That works out the same wherever in the world you are, unless travelling at a significant fraction of the speed of light. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Monday, 14 April 2003 10:41:13 UTC