- From: Benjamin D. Gray <bdgray@gcomputer.net>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 17:31:44 -0400 (EDT)
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>
I say, remove X11 Colors from CSS3 and SVG1.1 (or at least depreciate them). Benjamin D. Gray WCIS Career Portfolio Web Developer http://uwyo.edu/wcis/portfolio/ On 5/27/02 3:26 PM, "fantasai" <fantasai@escape.com> wrote: >> As Steven Pemberton has pointed out, the process of deprecation does >> exist to gradually get rid of language features no longer desired. If >> codifying X11 colors into CSS3 is necessary, then do so and deprecate >> them, >A reasonable proposal - but I will not deprecate them in CSS3 unless the SVG working group also >deprecates in SVG 1.1. >In fact, everyone who feels strongly against the X11 colors should forward their posts to >www-svg@w3.org (cc'd), and request that SVG 1.1 deprecate (or remove - depending on your > opinion) them as well. >> as HTML 4 did with many HTML features. What compelling argument >> prevents this route? >Consistency between specs. Were SVG 1.1 to deprecate the X11 colors, then it would make >perfect sense to deprecate them in CSS3 Color. >> If you think X11 name support is important for the future, then I >> recommend you take Kynn's suggestion and separate it out of raw color >> values with functional notation. This leaves the syntax open to better >> naming schemes CSS may want to adopt in the future. >Either the X11 colors should be advocated as is, or they should be deprecated as is. >I don't think it makes any sense to go with introducing a new syntax for something you >want deprecated. >Tantek
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2002 15:11:54 UTC