- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 11:11:09 +0100
- To: ewexler@stickdog.com
- CC: www-style@w3.org
ewexler@stickdog.com wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: >> The hyphen is the character recommended by the working group to use as prefixes >> for proprietary properties. >> >> Specifically, the suggested syntax to use is: >> >> -vendor-property > > Why does the working group suggest a lexical illegality when the risk of > name conflicts without the illegality remains trivially low? Lexical > conformance is something whose importance I want to \_underscore\_. Because underscores are ugly. However, as I said, if the lexical illegality is a big deal for anyone then underscores are an acceptable substitute. -- Ian Hickson ``The inability of a user agent to implement part of this specification due to the limitations of a particular device (e.g., non interactive user agents will probably not implement dynamic pseudo-classes because they make no sense without interactivity) does not imply non-conformance.'' -- Selectors, Sec13
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2002 06:11:16 UTC