- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:26:17 +0000
- To: Daniel Steinberger <Daniel.Steinberger@gmx.de>
- CC: "Tantek Çelik (Microsoft Corporation)" <tantekc@microsoft.com>, "Chris Lilley (W3C)" <chris@w3.org>, "Steven Pemberton (CWI)" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>, "Brad Pettit (Microsoft Corporation)" <bradp@microsoft.com>, www-style@w3.org
Daniel Steinberger wrote:
>
> I also wonder, why there is an 'inherit' value for this property.
All properties have an inherit value. (And an initial value.) It's part of the
syntax.
> So now my proposal:
>
> Instead of having one property to mask the whole element (and if the element
> is a block-level element containing others, all those sub-elements), I
> suggest introducing properties for each nessesary type of elements:
>
> Name: opacity-background
You can do that already using the rgba() syntax.
For example:
background: rgba(128, 64, 64, 0.2);
color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 1);
border: solid thick rgba(255, 128, 128, 1);
HTH,
--
Ian Hickson
``The inability of a user agent to implement part of this specification due to
the limitations of a particular device (e.g., non interactive user agents will
probably not implement dynamic pseudo-classes because they make no sense
without interactivity) does not imply non-conformance.'' -- Selectors, Sec13
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2002 14:26:31 UTC