- From: Dorothea Salo <dsalo@overdrive.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 07:43:35 -0600
- To: "Www-Style" <www-style@w3.org>
> I think this is a good idea. I would suggest doing it by adding display: > table-column-header-group and table-column-footer-group with the > equivalent > semantics that the row versions have (namely, changing the order of the > rendering of the respective columns so that they are at the > start/end of the > table respectively). Sounds eminently reasonable. > In practice, though, it won't do what you are asking for. Well, CSS might not *demand* that it do what I'm asking for (nor am I suggesting it should), but I doubt CSS would *prevent* it. As you say, the basic listed function of display: table-header-group is placing the group in the flow of the table. Still, there's nothing (as far as I can tell, anyway) to stop a UA from implementing the behavior I outlined in my earlier post if it found that behavior useful -- the CSS is enough to base such an implementation on, and the CSS spec doesn't forbid it. > Repeating on a > continuous medium would be done using overflow:scroll on the body > group that > they sandwich, and means that what you are asking for can already > be done in > CSS2. Aha! A tactic we had not noticed. Thank you. I will pass this information to the PSWG. Dorothea
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2002 08:44:35 UTC